Their validity has been debated by scientists and pseudoscience practitioners for many years.
While pseudoscience proponents declare that the number of unexplained phenomena on document is proof of the legitimacy of their beliefs, their opponents maintain that something can’t be a science if its basic laws are unknown and its existence stays unproven. Anomalies are useful in science because they level to a shortage or a hole in our current understanding, they usually point to the method in which to discoveries. However, in search of anomalies as a way of creating a conclusion is what we call anomaly hunting. Some anthroposophic doctors oppose…
Devamı ...